diff --git a/content/bookmarks/in-defense-of-myers-briggs.md b/content/bookmarks/in-defense-of-myers-briggs.md index 44fdabae..0eea4673 100644 --- a/content/bookmarks/in-defense-of-myers-briggs.md +++ b/content/bookmarks/in-defense-of-myers-briggs.md @@ -15,12 +15,13 @@ references: I fit the eNxP model by this article's assertions, and it feels representative enough to be useful. I like the idea of these tools to label & understand yourself _particularly_ because you can figure out where you _don't_ fit the model/where the label _isn't_ useful. +``` ๐šŽ๐™ฝ๐šก๐™ฟ ๐Ÿ„ธ โ€“โ€“โ€“๐šŽโ€“ ๐Ÿ„ด ๐Ÿ…‚ โ€“โ€“โ€“โ€“๐™ฝ ๐Ÿ„ฝ ๐Ÿ„ต โ€“โ€“๐šกโ€“โ€“ ๐Ÿ…ƒ ๐Ÿ„น โ€“โ€“โ€“โ€“๐™ฟ ๐Ÿ„ฟ - +``` ### Highlights