mirror of
https://github.com/by-jp/www.byjp.me.git
synced 2025-08-09 05:36:07 +01:00
Imports
This commit is contained in:
parent
0476eef4c4
commit
e462d0a76b
2 changed files with 63 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -1,13 +1,20 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: Shaping the future
|
||||
emoji: 🚀
|
||||
date: "2024-09-02T10:54:02Z"
|
||||
emoji: "\U0001F680"
|
||||
bookmarkOf: https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2007/05/shaping-the-future.html
|
||||
references:
|
||||
bookmark:
|
||||
url: https://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2007/05/shaping-the-future.html
|
||||
type: entry
|
||||
name: Shaping the future
|
||||
summary: (One of the things that goes with being an SF writer is that people expect
|
||||
you to talk about, well, the future. Last week, engineering consultancy TNG
|
||||
Technology Consulting invited me to Munich to address one of their technology
|
||||
open days. Here's a transcript of my talk, which discusses certain under-considered
|
||||
side effects of some technologies that you're probably already becoming familiar
|
||||
with. Note that this is a long blog entry — even by my verbose standards — so
|
||||
you'll need to hit on the "continue reading" link to see the whole thing.)
|
||||
---
|
||||
What does the future of technology hold, to a predictive thinker in the year 2007?
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
55
content/bookmarks/the-home-as-a-place-of-production.md
Normal file
55
content/bookmarks/the-home-as-a-place-of-production.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: The home as a place of production
|
||||
date: "2024-09-09T12:51:03Z"
|
||||
emoji: "\U0001F3E1"
|
||||
publishDate: "2024-03-27T17:42:27Z"
|
||||
bookmarkOf: https://cityquitters.substack.com/p/the-home-as-a-place-of-production
|
||||
references:
|
||||
bookmark:
|
||||
url: https://cityquitters.substack.com/p/the-home-as-a-place-of-production
|
||||
type: entry
|
||||
name: The home as a place of production
|
||||
summary: Diverse work and the joy of making
|
||||
author: Karen Rosenkranz
|
||||
---
|
||||
Bringing more creation into our homes as a way to feel connected to our surroundings and communities. I couldn't appreciate this article more!
|
||||
|
||||
### Highlights
|
||||
|
||||
> Connectivity and the distraction it enables should be contained.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> Everything is optimised for convenience, comfort and safety for the consumer (and surveillance/value extraction for the corporations providing it).
|
||||
>
|
||||
> This vision doesn’t sound very smart to me. Not only is it incredibly dull, it’s also totally disempowering.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> turning the home into a place of production again (and I don’t mean productivity!).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> This home of the future is one of reduced complexity, a place filled with fewer things, but things we know how to care for and repair.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> Part of the appeal of leaving the city is the potential to create homes (and lives) that allow for a greater diversity of activities.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> As AI-generated content becomes ubiquitous, ‘made by humans’ will become a quality trademark.
|
||||
|
||||
It'll be interesting to see whether "made by humans" is used as a pro-positive selling point, or whether "made without AI" is used as an anti-negative one. Currently I'm seeing more of the second (eg. [Not by AI](https://notbyai.fyi/))
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> Everything we can do to loosen the grip of consumer capitalism on our lives helps us reclaim a bit of autonomy.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> These endeavours become even more empowering if they’re done in community.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> Let’s start here. Let’s replace personal comfort, convenience and safety with communal vitality, pleasure and agency.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue